Results 1 to 11 of 11

20s that bad in the 1/4

This is a discussion on 20s that bad in the 1/4 within the Performance forums, part of the General Discussion category; one of my friends was at the track last night with his scsb 5.3. His first one was a 15.8 ...

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Mcallen Texas
    Age
    26
    Posts
    593

    20s that bad in the 1/4


    Support FSC and see no ads! - Click Here
    one of my friends was at the track last night with his scsb 5.3. His first one was a 15.8 cuz he was spinning a lot, but that was with his 20s. Than switched out his rear tires to the stockers and he hit a 16. We went back and fowarth and with 20s hes in the high 15s, without them hes in the 16s. Im thinking about putting 20s on my new truck...but will the same thing happen. This truck again is going to be ext cab in the performance area. Will 20s really hurt it that bad?
    --CARNAGE--
    2000 5.3L ExtCab SS *SuperStock*
    Best 1/4 - 15.5

    Mods- K&N Intake, Magnaflow 2.5" single in/out , and free mods! BOOYA!
    STS Soon!

  2. #2
    Registered User SyckShyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Joplin, MO
    Posts
    1,820

    Re: 20s that bad in the 1/4

    The proof is in what you posted... People say its more unsprung weight and its evil blah blah. But the clock doesnt lie.

  3. #3
    Original Gold Member SLMDLT1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Gainesville, Florida
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,768

    Re: 20s that bad in the 1/4

    Depends on what size tires, since it essentially regears the truck for you.
    2003 GMC Sierra ECSB Z71...6-7.5" Superlift, 20" Eagle 064s on 37x13.50x20 Kumho MT's, Predator, etc.
    1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28, LS1/M6/C5's/SPEC/Lid/LT'S/MAGNAFLOW

  4. #4
    03 Tahoe Physh1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Morgan Hill, CA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,211

    Re: 20s that bad in the 1/4

    I'm not sure what you're asking. He's faster with the 20's on the truck as you noted so what is going to get hurt? Now, don't expect a faster time just because something has 20's...has to do with rotational weight, the weight of the wheels, and the tires....

    16's with stockers and high 15's with 20s.

    Cameron
    / 2003 Tahoe LT / 22" Boss 330 / Heinz 57 3"-5" drop / Pioneer / US Speedo / De-badged / E-fans / BlackBear91 / Corsa Sport / "Big 3" /

    My 03 Tahoe Build Thread

    "The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynacism
    by those who don't have it.
    " - George Bernard Shaw

  5. #5
    ?????????????
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Longview, TX
    Posts
    707

    Re: 20s that bad in the 1/4

    all of them are going to make a difference but some less than others. if your lookin to keep them light go with a good billet wheel.

  6. #6
    Registered User NqSilverado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Mesa, Az
    Posts
    448

    Re: 20s that bad in the 1/4

    I bet he has light weight 20's and they have more traction because they are wider or have a better tire

    04 Silverado SBSC
    -Flowmaster
    -Procomp
    -Open Filter
    -5%Tint
    -265-75-16 AT II

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Mcallen Texas
    Age
    26
    Posts
    593

    Re: 20s that bad in the 1/4

    I called him up to see what they were, they are chrome 20x9.5 now im thinking of getting sumtin similar but in billet *since they are lighter*. Do you guys recomend going with 20x9.5 all around, or something like 20x8.5 on the front and 20x9.5 or is that just for looks?
    --CARNAGE--
    2000 5.3L ExtCab SS *SuperStock*
    Best 1/4 - 15.5

    Mods- K&N Intake, Magnaflow 2.5" single in/out , and free mods! BOOYA!
    STS Soon!

  8. #8
    Registered User SyckShyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Joplin, MO
    Posts
    1,820

    Re: 20s that bad in the 1/4

    9.5 in the front sticks out doesnt it?

  9. #9
    Registered User Jimmy P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Detroit, Mi
    Age
    29
    Posts
    8,164

    Re: 20s that bad in the 1/4

    8.5s up front and 10s out back....no need for a big meat up front
    1989 Silverado Project // 2013 GMC Sierra

  10. #10
    technut
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    north little rock, arkansas
    Posts
    3,632

    Re: 20s that bad in the 1/4

    bet hes running 35psi on a 300+ treadwear tire. sure its gunna spin.
    airdeano
    2001 Silverado 4.8L 4-spd Automatic 3.42
    ? horsepower
    ? torque
    will find out soon!

    1965 C10 5.3L (SSR) TH4L60e
    (It's Alive! 07/04 It Drives! 03/05 Daily Driver XX/08!)

  11. #11
    turning 10's
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    818

    Re: 20s that bad in the 1/4

    Appearance is subjective. Your money, your ride. Spend it as you wish. However, performance is objective. Overall diameter and mass of the wheel will affect the performance in handling and acceleration. For acceleration, you want small overall diameter (for buzzing the engine to redline quicker) and the least mass. However, small diameter gives it small contact surface. For handling, you want the least side wall height. Why not invest in a set of cheap steel wheels with good slicks for the track?
    A bunch of 1st gen big block Camaro's

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
     BMW - Cadillac - Camaro - Corvette - Mercedes - Mustang - F150 - Ferrari - Lamborghini - Porsche - Ranger