Results 1 to 14 of 14

Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

This is a discussion on Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no? within the Exhaust forums, part of the Performance category; I got the Jesse tune with a K&N and descreened MAF sensor. Now I want more. I've seen many people ...

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Liberty, TX
    Age
    37
    Posts
    20

    Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?


    Support FSC and see no ads! - Click Here
    I got the Jesse tune with a K&N and descreened MAF sensor. Now I want more. I've seen many people suggest headers. But from people that I talk to daily, they scare me by mentioning all the headaches that come with headers. Are they worth it? Everyone mentions exhaust leaks, heat under the hood, and that some of them are loud, kinda a pinging sound???? I just don't know if I need this since this is my everyday work/family truck. What do you guys think? I lot of these guys are old school, have headers gotten any better, as with leaks and such? thanks for any advice.


    PS. If not headers, what would be the logical next step other than a Cold air intake?

  2. #2
    DES=guilty til innocent H&S_Miner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Green Valley, AZ
    Age
    33
    Posts
    12,416

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    why would you want headers, the truck came perfect from the factory


    with headers, you sometimes get what you pay for. if you do a search on here, you should find lots of helpful info. about headers, both long tube and short tube.

    as long as you put some anti=sieze (i believe) on the olts before you put em in and you torque em right and check once in a while it shouldn't be a big deal. Also try and look for headers that have a nice, good, thick flange on them and have good welds.
    Proud father of 2 sons
    Jonathan Blake: 8/31/01
    Robert Elliot: 6/29/07

    My AMERICAN BUILT Ricer: http://s12.photobucket.com/albums/a2...%20Crew%20Cab/

  3. #3
    Some kittens can fly! mikeoxlong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    630

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    I wouldn't bother with headers unless you get long-tubes. I have Thorley Tri-Ys, which on the NBS trucks is a full-length. I'm sure about NA performance gains, but there was definitely a difference with my blower. The cheapest longtubes I've seen are here.

  4. #4
    ......................... Atomic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Scottsboro/Tuscaloosa, Alabama
    Age
    24
    Posts
    6,279

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    I have eldelbrock shorties and noticed a gain in the upper speed range (70+)

    1 think I dont like about them is they make this kind of airy sound, doesnt sound right but everything is fine, so whatever. Passenger side fitted great, no trouble. The drive side had a small leak on the back cylinder which the addition of the stock plus included gasket fixed.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Mississippi
    Age
    31
    Posts
    16

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    MAN GET SOME HEADERS, I have a 05 extended cab with hooker long tubes and love them, before that i had JBA shorties, but i wanted a little more power so i went with the long tubes.. As for leaks, aint going to happen if they are installed right, heat under the hood, no more than stock specially if you get ceramic coated headers. As for installing, not that big of a deal IF YOU HAVE A LIFT, otherwise it can be a pain. But its all worth it when you blow by your buddies!!!.. By the way i'm running a 22'' hooker aero chamber muffler with duel turn downs and no cats and it sounds awesome

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Liberty, TX
    Age
    37
    Posts
    20

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    Shun, what kind of gains did you see after you installed your headers?

  7. #7
    DES=guilty til innocent H&S_Miner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Green Valley, AZ
    Age
    33
    Posts
    12,416

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    Quote Originally Posted by KrazyKevin
    Shun, what kind of gains did you see after you installed your headers?
    deending upon what headers you get this will change.

    long tubes will give you better gains in the lowend while shorties will give you more gains in the upper range.
    Proud father of 2 sons
    Jonathan Blake: 8/31/01
    Robert Elliot: 6/29/07

    My AMERICAN BUILT Ricer: http://s12.photobucket.com/albums/a2...%20Crew%20Cab/

  8. #8
    Born and Raised Chevrolet YenkoST's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    2,783

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    With ceramic coating I did a comparison on my Edelbrock uncoated headers versus my dad's/brothers/best friends headers and they all were 200 degrees less than mine on each primary....that says that they keep the engine compartment cooler!!

    1990 Chevrolet C1500 Sport
    *The Hot Rod
    2008 Pontiac G8 GT
    *Kooks headers, Kooks Catted mid-pipes, Magnaflow axle backs, CAI, ported throttle body, HP Tuners
    2012 Chevrolet Tahoe
    *Tint, HP Tuners

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Liberty, TX
    Age
    37
    Posts
    20

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    Is the sound gonna be that much louder than my 14" magnaflow with dual turndowns?

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Mississippi
    Age
    31
    Posts
    16

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    It will change the sound a little, but as for the gains kevin, didnt see much with the shorties but the long tubes make alot more power. Definitely worth the exra money!!

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Woodstock Ontario Canada
    Age
    37
    Posts
    8,263

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    The cheaper the header usually the thinner the header tubing. edelbrock has the the thinest on the market, I think they are 18 guage. I have been told that even with no leaks the Edelbrock headers tick a lot.

    Hookers are 14 and 16 guage tubing, mine are quiet.

    these headers are for the newer trucks
    http://www.stainlessworks.net/cart/i...ath=94_265_362

    They come either as headers only, headers with cheater pipes and headers and cats.
    these are stainless steel with 1 3/4" primaries and 3" collectors. I would use these on a 6.0 or a highly modded cam and headed , supercharged or nitroused 5.3l. They are pretty big for a stock 5.3L. But they would work, they would have good gains in the upper rpms for sure.

    these are Hooker shorties
    http://www.holley.com/data/products/...e2083-1HKR.jpg
    they have 16 guage tubes that are 1.625"


    Hooker longtubes, these are from their Super Competition Series for the 99-05 trucksin 2wd are 285 1hkr coated, 2850 hrk black paint these are 1.625"x 3" collectors
    the 2851 1hrk coated and 2851 hkr black paint longtubes are 1 3/4" x 3" collectros, both of these Hooker longtubes are 18 gauge with 5/16" flanges.

    My 1997 Hooker Competition(not super comps) are 1 5/8 x 2.5" with 16 gauge tubing with 5/16" flanges.

    The headers are from The Other Guys Headers, these are for the 4.8 and 5.3
    http://www.performance-exhaust-heade...vy-580022.html

    these are for the 6.0 , looks like they come with dual 3" headpipes
    http://www.performance-exhaust-heade...vy-600222.html

    The Other Guys, use 1/2" thick flanges and 14 gauge pipes, these are some of thebest headers available, they are expensive though.
    here is their homepage, http://www.performance-exhaust-headers.com/

    I wonder if you could get the TOG 6.0 headers with the dual 3" headpipes and use them on a 1.2 ton. That would be awesome. It looks as though the TOG's are a mid length header.


    I would put my money eslewhere in a NBS truck, these trucks need some better low rpm torque help, a torque converter would be the ticket. A Torque Converter out of a Chevy Trailblazer withthe 4,2l inline six is the hot ticket for the NBS engines, it stalls to around 2600rpm behind a 5,3, more if its a 6.0, less if its a 4.8.
    there are people here that are getting Yank torque converters, some of these things can shve up to 3/4 of asecond off your 1/4 mile ET and only affect in town driving when the TCC isnt locked. On the highway it drives like stock, until you hammer on it, then the TCC unlocks and your engine is in its powerband no matter what gear you are in. The TC helps lower the rpm drop when the trans shfts gears, they help at any speed, not just from a dead stop. with a trans cooler and a sensible sctall speed, towing capacity isnt affected.

    If you are stuck on headers, get the longest primary tubes you can find, these trcuks come with excellent exhausts from the factory, save for the mufflers. The manifolds cats, pipes and tail pipes all are good, just hack off the stock muffler and install a high flow unit. As stated before, thick flanges and retorquing the bolts will keep them from leaking. I would be tempetd to buy longtube headers that came complete with headpipes and cats, so you dont have top spend as much at the local exhaust shop, getting everything welded in. Not many longtube headers will just bolt into the stock exhaust as they exit a lot farther back than the stock manifolds and shorty headers.

    With my longtubes, dual 2.5" exhaust(headpipes, cats and muffler) and an ed Wright tune(100%)TM removed, I dropped my 1/4 mile time by 3/4 of a second.

    If you spent $600 on a set of headers or $600 of a higher stall torque converter, I am afraid to say it, but I think the TC will give you better acceleration.

    i have spent a lot of money on boltons, Iwish I have just gotten a low boost supercharger at the start, I would have been much faster and quicker than I am now. Instead of getting my K&N FIPK, Jet PCM and Lock rite locker by Powertrax, I could have taken that money and bought a brand new 5 clutch Precision Industries or similar Yank Torque converter, I would have had a better gain than all 3 of those things combined. Oh well burn and learn I guess.

    Paully
    97 GMC 2wd RCSB 5.7, s10 2700 footstall, Hooker 24621hkr LT's , 2.5" cats dual 4"pipes exit B4 pass. side tire, custom driveshaft 3.42 G80 FIPK MAF descreen GM/Mercruiser Marine intake manifold 29lb LS2(EV6) injectors Ed Wright PCM(best mod), LT4 KM 14.8@94mph 2.007 4000lbs 122mph

  12. #12
    "she likes it that way" Z71dook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona FL,
    Age
    31
    Posts
    270

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    i would think that your de screaned maf would be more of a concerne than headers..

  13. #13
    Blazer drivin' mofo Loudnfast91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    North Dakota
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,473

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    If you decide on headers, get a long tube tri-y design, and get them coated. The guy who had my truck before me bought the non-coated ones, and they are blue and look like sh!t

    99 RCSB // 4.8 / 4l60E / Vette Servo / HPTuners / .218.227 - .525.525 hotcam / dropped torsion keys / 3.73 //
    PARTING OUT A 98 K1500 OBS - CLICK HERE FOR DETAILS

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Mississippi
    Age
    31
    Posts
    16

    Re: Headers for a 2004 Ext. Cab, get em or no?

    I agree with you Z71dook, I had Thunder Racing install a cam in my truck and they said DO NOT descreen the MAF.. It screws the timing up, because of invalid readings.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
     BMW - Cadillac - Camaro - Corvette - Mercedes - Mustang - F150 - Ferrari - Lamborghini - Porsche - Ranger