FSC Forum - View Single Post - 90 454SS vs 94 Lightning

rdinmv · 09-19-2008, 09:09 PM

a 454 ss and a 351w lightning? lets compare apples to apples....a 460 lightning would be a better comparison.

I'm a ford guy but also have chevy's and like my chevy's too (my duramax eats powerstrokes), the lightning was much more even with 100 less cubes, just like if you compared a 5.7 impala ss to a 4.6 maurauder, Sorry to say but Ford had the better idea, the lightning handled way better as well, now if you look at current tech, GM rocks in the engine dept but the 2nd gen lighning has yet to be beat as far as factory offerings.

09-19-2008, 09:09 PM	#260
rdinmv Registered User Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: so cal Posts: 8	Re: 90 454SS vs 94 Lightning - TrucksTV a 454 ss and a 351w lightning? lets compare apples to apples....a 460 lightning would be a better comparison. I'm a ford guy but also have chevy's and like my chevy's too (my duramax eats powerstrokes), the lightning was much more even with 100 less cubes, just like if you compared a 5.7 impala ss to a 4.6 maurauder, Sorry to say but Ford had the better idea, the lightning handled way better as well, now if you look at current tech, GM rocks in the engine dept but the 2nd gen lighning has yet to be beat as far as factory offerings.