View Full Version : Rebuilding 1992 4x4 350.


R_Boyd
07-05-2007, 06:22 AM
Hello everyone. I have decided to go ahead and rebuild the 350 that is in my 1992 4x4 1500 Silverado. As it sits it burns its fair share of oil and is due for a rebuild. I'm not sure whether to use the current block in there (high stress on it, was used to pull a 5th wheel, valve seals are worn, and the pistons rings are probably tired as well) and bore it .030" and make it a 355, or just buy a shortblock and get some vortec heads and after market cam. Now after doing some reading I think I have picked a combination that would work well for what I want. The specs on it are as follows;

1.94" intake, 1.50" exhaust, 76cc combustion chamber, 9.5:1 compression, Edelbrock performer manifold, and 1-5/8" headers. Cam is a Competition cam 265 DEH, with .442/.465", and duration at .050" lift: 211/221 degrees. This combination is said to make 388 ft-lb of torque at 3750 rpm, and 337 hp at 5250. This was running a 650cfm Holley carb.

I'm mostly interested in building a bit of a torquer as it is a 4x4, and I mostly play around in the mud/ trails without running it all that high in the rpm's. It also has to be friendly in daily circumstances, as it is my DD and I don't want too aggressive a cam.

Does this sound like a reasonable combination for what I want to do? I was thinking of running the stock TBI system, with stock injectors. Is this a good or bad idea, would I have to go with a larger size injector and have to switch to the marine intake manifold? I would be sending the chip in to probably PCM4less and getting it retuned as well.

What other options do you think would fit my application? I'm open to suggestions and would greatly appreciate some input as this is the first time I've ever done something like this, and I'm only 17 trying to learn. Thanks

93ChevyTBI
07-05-2007, 02:22 PM
The specs on my motor are almost identical to yours even though I have a different cam. You're about to make the same mistake I did. My power/torque is too high as it is and my specs are 212/218 @.05...your's is even higher = less torque down low. I'm swapping my cam for one with less duration. Thinking about a voodoo 60100 or Comp 12-231-2. You also about to make another mistake I did....go 383 if you want torque...I didn't and regret it every day. For $200 or so (just guessing) you get around 40 ft/lbs more. Mine acts more like a hot rod on top than the 4x4 it is. But I'll get it there.

R_Boyd
07-05-2007, 05:19 PM
Hmm, alright, thanks. I'm just unsure of how much extra the 383 will cost. I'm really torn between how much it will cost to do all the machine work for it, as compared to ending up buying a crate. Well, at least my dad is, I would prefer to build my own. Thanks for the response!

1BadZ71Tahoe
07-05-2007, 08:39 PM
Hmm, alright, thanks. I'm just unsure of how much extra the 383 will cost. I'm really torn between how much it will cost to do all the machine work for it, as compared to ending up buying a crate. Well, at least my dad is, I would prefer to build my own. Thanks for the response!

As Colby04 once said, "I like Built, not Re-Built".

- B

bowtiejack
07-06-2007, 07:08 PM
as happy as i am with the 355 i built , i would go the extra inch to a 383 in a heart beat . just to get me up off the line would be just about right . my 60' time is way over 2. but i still beat 15 seconds all day.shoulda gone 383 to have something to really brag about. just my 2 cents.

Fast305
07-06-2007, 10:15 PM
as happy as i am with the 355 i built , i would go the extra inch to a 383 in a heart beat . just to get me up off the line would be just about right . my 60' time is way over 2. but i still beat 15 seconds all day.shoulda gone 383 to have something to really brag about. just my 2 cents.

I have built 2 396 CID small blocks out of 350 blocks now and would not look down. Total build cost was about $300.00 more than a 383. Building a 396 small block basically takes some more grinding on the lower block area and a reduced base circle camshaft to fit the 3.875" stroke crankshaft, same 4.030" bore as a 383.