Go Back   FSC Forum > General Discussion > Classics
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Supporting Members Don't see these ads...learn more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-20-2008, 11:09 AM   #1
FordeatinZ71
FSC Drunkin Teem

FordeatinZ71's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Aug 2002
Member ID: 2427
Location: Hooks, Texas...i keep working closer and closer to 'Bama!
Age: 25
Posts: 2,874
well, in light of gas prices...
i am thinking about going a different route with my engine plans. i had planned on building my 350 into a 383 and putting it in, which would have made a STOUT motor, but a VERY fuel-thirsty one at that. well, i have always loved mixing new and old and thought i would jump on the "lets put a 5.3 in my 73-87" bandwagon. i know i can do some moderate modification and i'll have almost as much power as i was gonna have with my 383 and i'll still get better fuel mileage. now i just have to sell my 350. i found a rebuildable 5.3 for $300 and the same place sells ECMs for $25. so i am pretty sure i'm gonna go that route and then just build a stout lil 5.3...thoughts?
<---thanks 454SS!!

1991 Chevy Silverado K1500 extended cab, 350, 700R4 with shift kit, exhaust work...in need of body work...lol...

1983 GMC Sierra K1500 sold...
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 12:01 PM   #2
daved931
Registered User

daved931's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Member ID: 87774
Location: Bangor, ME
Age: 26
Posts: 1,070
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
Do it. If you put some good heads and a cam in a 5.3 with some headers, it'll rock your world (and wreck your tires).
1999 Tahoe LS 2-Door 4x4 w/ 3.73 G80. Custom tune from Justin @ Blackbear and a Vette 1 - 2 servo.

Brakestands make for great aroma therapy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 01:15 PM   #3
83K1500
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Member ID: 76540
Location: Illinois
Age: 32
Posts: 283
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
See I am going another way...
Building the 383 and keeping it carb'd.
No not cause I have a *hitload of money (I wish I did), but because it will be a strict towing vehicle.
I am going into business for myself buying blown engine/trans/head or similar cars that are in good shape, fix, and sell.
So far I have a 91 Civic, 92 Accord and lined up a 92 F-Body, a 94 Grand Prix and looking at two late model Probes.

Hell I only paid $200 each for the Honda's... Which will sell like $1.00 gas once done.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 05:24 PM   #4
FordeatinZ71
FSC Drunkin Teem

FordeatinZ71's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Aug 2002
Member ID: 2427
Location: Hooks, Texas...i keep working closer and closer to 'Bama!
Age: 25
Posts: 2,874
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
i hear ya. i'd love to build a rowdy 383 but i know if i build a rowdy 5.3 i will get close to (or better if i play it right) performance and better fuel economy.
<---thanks 454SS!!

1991 Chevy Silverado K1500 extended cab, 350, 700R4 with shift kit, exhaust work...in need of body work...lol...

1983 GMC Sierra K1500 sold...
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 06:30 PM   #5
chubyboy
What should I put here...

Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Member ID: 90559
Location: Appleton, MN
Age: 19
Posts: 58
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
if u really want to go crazy, build for e85 bu raising the com. ratio considerably. the reason flexfuel vehivles have less power, etc on e85 is beccause e85 requires higher comp. which would cause SEVERE knock with gas...it all boils down to the whole comprimise theory of stock vehicles, i also believe u may get better gas mileage with the higher comp. ratio, but i am not for certain. HTH
1993 FORD ESCORT LX SEDAN

1978 CHEVY C10 SCOTTSDALE, 2 DOOR, LONGBOX(BIG 10) 350CI 4BBL V8
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 07:41 PM   #6
modular93fox
be punished

Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Member ID: 65701
Location: houston
Posts: 455
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
do it, i just hit 20.5 mpg in my brick with 3.08 gears... bone stock, nelson perf. tune, full exhuast and cai. good stuff man, way different than a car (to me).
uh, nothing major to look out for other than the costs of money and time. i got jdstevens :) mind made up a few months ago and he did a 6.0 swap :) woot woot..
on a 2nd note.. i passed inspecion with flying colors with a *u know what*..... yeah i was like lets see how it does.. = pass... hells to the yeah!
fordeatingz71 you aughta do the swap.
clint
1987 5.3 4l60e Silverado - new daily driver with A/C - also for sale @ $7,000
A poor man buy's it twice
1993 4.6 t-45 Mustang GT for sale 5,000
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 08:44 PM   #7
GreaseDog
King Of The Hill

GreaseDog's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member ID: 21917
Location: IN
Age: 27
Posts: 6,535
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
just because an engine is bigger doesnt mean it will get worse fuel economy. the increased torque of the 383 will have to do less work to move the truck so it very well could end up consuming less fuel to drive the truck.
1977 Chevy K20 - 1980 GMC K2500 - 1992 Chevy C1500 SWB - 1993 Chevy C2500 SAS - 1994 Chevy K1500
READ HERE BEFORE ASSUMING YOU NEED A NEW ENGINE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 08:56 PM   #8
GMC Era
Registered User

GMC Era's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Member ID: 81026
Location: Oakland, TN
Age: 29
Posts: 163
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreaseDog
just because an engine is bigger doesnt mean it will get worse fuel economy. the increased torque of the 383 will have to do less work to move the truck so it very well could end up consuming less fuel to drive the truck.
His Carbed 383 would not get the mileage a 5.3 would get him. But I agree with your theory though.
1999 Sierra ECSB, 5.3L, 3.42 Locking Rear, True Flow Filter, Dynomax Super Turbo
www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Y-TYK3zONU
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RT50UUQQg0&feature=user

Last edited by GMC Era : 06-20-2008 at 08:56 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 09:18 PM   #9
chubyboy
What should I put here...

Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Member ID: 90559
Location: Appleton, MN
Age: 19
Posts: 58
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
+1
1993 FORD ESCORT LX SEDAN

1978 CHEVY C10 SCOTTSDALE, 2 DOOR, LONGBOX(BIG 10) 350CI 4BBL V8
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 11:14 AM   #10
FordeatinZ71
FSC Drunkin Teem

FordeatinZ71's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Aug 2002
Member ID: 2427
Location: Hooks, Texas...i keep working closer and closer to 'Bama!
Age: 25
Posts: 2,874
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
well, my 383 was gonna be fuel injected...and yea, it might have done alright on fuel, but i think the 5.3 will end up being better in the long run. and FWIW modular93fox, you convinced me to do it too...lol. wish you were closer so i could take a ride in that sucker to really see what i should expect. although i plan to put a healthy cam in mine before it gets installed...probably do some other mods to wake it up too...
<---thanks 454SS!!

1991 Chevy Silverado K1500 extended cab, 350, 700R4 with shift kit, exhaust work...in need of body work...lol...

1983 GMC Sierra K1500 sold...
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 08:56 PM   #11
GreaseDog
King Of The Hill

GreaseDog's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member ID: 21917
Location: IN
Age: 27
Posts: 6,535
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
comparing an injected 383 to a 5.3 is nuts. you're dealing with a truck, and trucks are heavy. the 5.3 is missing something VERY important in a truck. TORQUE. i'll bet the injected 383 will kill the 5.3 in milage in your 4x4.
1977 Chevy K20 - 1980 GMC K2500 - 1992 Chevy C1500 SWB - 1993 Chevy C2500 SAS - 1994 Chevy K1500
READ HERE BEFORE ASSUMING YOU NEED A NEW ENGINE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 09:01 PM   #12
83K1500
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Member ID: 76540
Location: Illinois
Age: 32
Posts: 283
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
Well I will say that with the 305 in my truck WAYYY back when, it was lucky to get 13-14.
Put in 383 and new trans it jumped to almost 20, like 19.something. Shocked the crap outta me I tell ya.
I switched out the 383 for a 89 GTA 350 roller pushing 210K and was back to 14-15 if I stayed out of it. Then the #2 main support snapped, and I am back to slapping the 383 back together and installing it. But as I also said, it will see 95% towing duty with a 5000Lb winch equipped tow dolly so I want it to be able to get out of its own way.

That reminds me I will need to take pics once it is done so that I can show off the new front clip...

Last edited by 83K1500 : 06-21-2008 at 09:03 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 09:19 PM   #13
FordeatinZ71
FSC Drunkin Teem

FordeatinZ71's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Aug 2002
Member ID: 2427
Location: Hooks, Texas...i keep working closer and closer to 'Bama!
Age: 25
Posts: 2,874
Re: well, in light of gas prices...
well, i change my mind like the weather...as much as i'd love the 5.3 swap i'm swaying back and forth now. i'm thinking about just building the 383 i wanted to before. the 5.3 has so much electronic stuff i really worry about it's durability off road. i don't like having to work on my truck everytime i get a sensor wet...so i dunno. it's also tempting because i already have the 350, and it would be a cheaper route to go...i'm not sure yet though...
<---thanks 454SS!!

1991 Chevy Silverado K1500 extended cab, 350, 700R4 with shift kit, exhaust work...in need of body work...lol...

1983 GMC Sierra K1500 sold...
  Reply With Quote
Advertisements
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0