Go Back   FSC Forum > General Discussion > Diesel Tech.
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Supporting Members Don't see these ads...learn more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2006, 05:55 PM   #41
05CrewZ71
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Member ID: 42782
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24
Re: 06 vs 07 Duramax
We didnt really put men on the moon it was done in a holleywood studio and there was 2 shooters in the grassy knoll! however I wish I had a diesel more bang for your buck and so much easier to get more hp! though e85 is a idea in the right direction towards a solution! How about those 2 hippie kids on tv that drove the van across the US using old resturant grease or we could all put a food processor on our engine and hope for the same results and marty in back to the future ha ha ha
05 Crew Cab Z71 50 series flowmaster, K&N intake, Wait4Me tune, All paint matched
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 07:33 PM   #42
Frankenbiker
Truckin' Fool

Frankenbiker's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Member ID: 30048
Location: Grand Prairie,TX
Age: 38
Posts: 405
Re: 06 vs 07 Duramax
The big deal about sulfur in 2007-spec diesel has nothing to do with lubricity.

Sulfur in diesel KILLS the aftertreatment devices used in 2007-compliant engines. As little as one tankful of 500-ppm (LSD) will completely ruin them (but no harm to the engine itself.) It's expected that most retail fuel outlets will be selling LSD and ULSD, side-by-side at least for the first year or two, or until 2010 when ULSD will be mandated to be the only thing available.

ULSD won't harm older engines. Any change in lubricity that MIGHT have occured from the loss of sulfur content will be addressed with additives from the refiner, long before it ever reaches a retail outlet.

(I've got a bigger stake in this issue than most of the folks hanging around here... I burn 1500-2000 gallons a month, as an Owner/Operator; as such, I really feel no pity for someone who's moaning about filling his 34 gallon tank once a week. )

-blaine
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 09:06 PM   #43
dozerboy
Registered User

dozerboy's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member ID: 25211
Location: TX
Age: 25
Posts: 931
Re: 06 vs 07 Duramax
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankenbiker
It's expected that most retail fuel outlets will be selling LSD and ULSD, side-by-side at least for the first year or two,

No way, you may fine LSD some places but most likely not both. There not going to put aside refineries, pipe lines, or storage tanks for LSD.

These views expressed on this post are not my own, but rather randomly generated computer gibberish and in no way should be used to judge the author's IQ or mental health.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2006, 09:12 PM   #44
Frankenbiker
Truckin' Fool

Frankenbiker's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Member ID: 30048
Location: Grand Prairie,TX
Age: 38
Posts: 405
Re: 06 vs 07 Duramax
Quote:
Originally Posted by dozerboy
No way, you may fine LSD some places but most likely not both. There not going to put aside refineries, pipe lines, or storage tanks for LSD.

Actually, that's exactly what most places plan on doing; at least that's what I thought I'd read at one point this summer. Here's an online version of T/A's RoadKing Magazine's article on ULSD:

http://www.roadking.com/story.php?id=705

They mention that 80% of diesel sold must be ULSD as of 10/15/06...

-blaine

Last edited by Frankenbiker : 08-24-2006 at 09:27 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2006, 10:25 AM   #45
LostBoy
All That Is Man

LostBoy's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Member ID: 21194
Location: Colorado
Posts: 562
Re: 06 vs 07 Duramax
Quote:
Originally Posted by dozerboy
No way, you may fine LSD some places but most likely not both. There not going to put aside refineries, pipe lines, or storage tanks for LSD.

I think the purpose in selling both would be that fuel stations have to meet the demand for ULSD, but they'll have to exhaust the current supply of LSD as well before they can go with only 1 type.
Drive it like I stole it? Why slow down?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2006, 11:24 AM   #46
Yamsi401
Registered User

Yamsi401's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Member ID: 51767
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 31
Re: 06 vs 07 Duramax
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostBoy
I think the purpose in selling both would be that fuel stations have to meet the demand for ULSD, but they'll have to exhaust the current supply of LSD as well before they can go with only 1 type.

The infrastructure is not there in established stations to do that. You'd have to add a tank and pump for the ULSD and then retire the plumbing for the LSD when the supply is exhausted.

Most stations that suport Diesel have 4 tanks on their lot - 87, 89, 91 Octane gasolines and a single Diesel tank. If the tank holds 500 gallons I'm sure they'll drain that tank dry of LSD and then start filling it with ULSD. Too bad since that tank must have some sludge in the base and draining it will end up in pumping sludge into a vehicle's tank.
The garage

'86 Jeep 2.8 V6 (#2 Son's)
'97 Jeep 4.0 I6(#3 Son's)
'05 Jeep 5.7 HEMI (my lovely wife's)
'06 Silverado 2500HD LT3 w/LBZ Diesel 4x4
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2419360
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2006, 02:07 PM   #47
GetMore
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2005
Member ID: 28812
Location: Patterson, NY
Posts: 115
Re: 06 vs 07 Duramax
Actually, what they are going to be doing is filling the LSD tanks with ULSD. Because of the sulfur left in the tanks (as part of the fuel already there) the tanks will not be considered ULSD, and are therefore LSD.

After a few refills the level of sulfur in the fuel will drop to ULSD levels, and the sticker will be placed on the pump saying it is safe for 2007 vehicles.

FWIW, some of the pumps out there are already pumping ULSD, but with slightly higher sulfur levels. Who knows when (probably just before October) they will test the fuel and give it the ULSD sticker.
2001 Silverado 2500HD 4x4, 6.0/4L80E
Stock/tow vehicle
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2006, 08:19 PM   #48
dozerboy
Registered User

dozerboy's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member ID: 25211
Location: TX
Age: 25
Posts: 931
Re: 06 vs 07 Duramax
X2 that the long version of what I was saying. The way I understand it they have been putting ULSD in the pipe lines but the LSD contaminates it. So they can't call it ULSD until the LSD has been flushed out of the tanks and pipe lines thoroughly.

These views expressed on this post are not my own, but rather randomly generated computer gibberish and in no way should be used to judge the author's IQ or mental health.

Last edited by dozerboy : 08-25-2006 at 08:20 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Advertisements
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0