![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | ||||||||||
|
Supporting Members Don't see these ads...learn more. |
||||||||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which are considered 'Riced'? | |||
| Smoke |
|
10 | 9.62% |
| Stacks |
|
12 | 11.54% |
| Lifted |
|
4 | 3.85% |
| None of the Above |
|
88 | 84.62% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 | |
|
IM MIKE D
Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Member ID: 50102
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 27
Posts: 1,360
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
im with you on the stacks but the lift i gotta disagree. i dont see how it negates the ability of the truck. i have a lift on my HD and it doesnt cut down its ability at least for what i use it for. in fact it helps me out because with the larger tires giving me more ground clearance i can get to more places offroad, like hunting spots that i couldnt get to before with no lift. and no sag here, i can throw my quad and gear in the back and it doesnt look any different than when im unloaded. even when i tow im not sagging but i dont tow any real heavy loads, just a boat and the occasional camper. i think if it did sag id put helper springs or airbags in cause i dont like the a$$ draggin look either. so what are your thoughts on "cali" style trucks where the a$$ end sits lower than the front even when unloaded? i figure you must love them! (i hate that look too) ![]() 03 GMC 2500 HD crew duramax, 6" full traction lift. 37/13.5/20 Toyo Open Country MT's, ATS E-Power tuner, AEM intake, Stage 3 allison 452 RWHP/755 TQ verified on superflo dyno, 7/19/08 (ATS level 10) and thanks to Chuggs for the sig!
Last edited by foreman00081 : 07-26-2007 at 12:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
|
I didnt really state my opinion before but.......
I agree with the unleveled trucks- queer as a 'football bat' But as for the stacks- on most all 2500+ trucks-diesels only- the nice chrome ones look sweet as honey, some that are on trucks like an S-10 I saw are retarted, cars should be burnt with them on, etc. So stacks on the right application (which I have only seen a couple that shouldn't be) are the best touch to a truck you could have. |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member ID: 26321
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada
Age: 31
Posts: 489
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Smoke is retarded. Why dump fuel you aren't gonna burn?
Bill
'99 2500 Suburban'07 Kawasaki Mean Streak'97 Chevy XCSB 4X4 350 Vortec 1500 '94 GMC Crew Cab 4X4 Diesel 3500
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Member ID: 43986
Pics: My Gallery
Location: houston,tx.
Posts: 25
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
I have all the 3" pipe and flexi-pipe to do stacks on my 3500HD flatbed and just can't bring myself around to put them on.
Mike |
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
IM MIKE D
Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Member ID: 50102
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 27
Posts: 1,360
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
just like why do a burnout? ya it wastes rubber but damn its fun isnt it? just like it is to dump a nice cloud of smoke once in a while. plus chicks dig it and most importantly it makes me feel manly! now doing it all the time just to look cool would be retarted ![]() 03 GMC 2500 HD crew duramax, 6" full traction lift. 37/13.5/20 Toyo Open Country MT's, ATS E-Power tuner, AEM intake, Stage 3 allison 452 RWHP/755 TQ verified on superflo dyno, 7/19/08 (ATS level 10) and thanks to Chuggs for the sig!
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
FSC Drunkin Teem
Status: Offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Member ID: 59935
Pics: My Gallery
Location: West Unity, OH
Age: 26
Posts: 880
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Who cares what someone else calls rice... its your truck do whatever you want to it, you're the one that has to drive it
1992 GMC K1500 Stepside, TBI 350, 5 Speed
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Chest Poundin' Apes!
Status: Offline
Join Date: Nov 2001
Member ID: 349
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Central PA
Age: 31
Posts: 6,855
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
If yout don't want to smoke then don't. I do see the flipside, the more we cruise around smoking, the sooner the eco terrorists will try to take it away. It should only be used when necesarry. Not just to haze out an intersection or piss innocent people off.
2004.5 Chevy CCSB D/A LLY
Tuff Country Suspension, Toyo MT's, Exhaust, EFI Live, Danville 64mm VVT, Kennedy Pumps, SunCoast IV, some Mike L. tranny stuff, some color matching, lots of other junk.
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Premium Member #112
One day at a time
Status: Offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Member ID: 36336
Pics: My Gallery
Location: lumberton texas
Posts: 1,293
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
Gale is a bitch's name anyways ![]() Last edited by crewcab06 : 07-26-2007 at 04:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Member ID: 43986
Pics: My Gallery
Location: houston,tx.
Posts: 25
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
People will not stop beside my truck in traffic especialy after running Marvel Mystery Oil in the tank. Something about the odor. Best yet is the idiot with widows open and boom box blaring beside me on the right side of the truck. A good stomping on the diesel throttle gets a good cussing at while they roll their windows up as fast as they can. Mike |
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member ID: 26321
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada
Age: 31
Posts: 489
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
The thing is, no matter how you look at it, you are over fueling your truck. I don't care about fuel mileage, but I don't understand dumping fuel for nothing. Now, if you are making so much power that you need a full on race tune, dual CP3's and injectors that flow like a garden hose, I understand that you can't back the fuel off enough to eliminate that smoke, but most of us won't be over 500 Hp, so in that case, smoke is not warrented. Bill
'99 2500 Suburban'07 Kawasaki Mean Streak'97 Chevy XCSB 4X4 350 Vortec 1500 '94 GMC Crew Cab 4X4 Diesel 3500
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Chest Poundin' Apes!
Status: Offline
Join Date: Nov 2001
Member ID: 349
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Central PA
Age: 31
Posts: 6,855
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
2004.5 Chevy CCSB D/A LLY
Tuff Country Suspension, Toyo MT's, Exhaust, EFI Live, Danville 64mm VVT, Kennedy Pumps, SunCoast IV, some Mike L. tranny stuff, some color matching, lots of other junk.
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
yeah I call it a Rado!
Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2002
Member ID: 1779
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Aurora, Ohio
Age: 25
Posts: 742
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
there is a price to pay for being a badass and right now it's about $2.67 a gallon using a litlle extra fuel here and there for the cool factor isn't too bad in my book.
Mike
02 Black Z71 5.3 Rado
4.10's G80 Locker UPD Intake Stainless Magnaflow catback Rancho Suspension Lift with 305/70/16 BFG Mt's 07 Black 6.6 Dmax Crew cab short box completely STOCK! but it's got a dvd player Last edited by BuiltupBowtie : 07-27-2007 at 04:00 PM. |
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Premium Member #112
One day at a time
Status: Offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Member ID: 36336
Pics: My Gallery
Location: lumberton texas
Posts: 1,293
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2005
Member ID: 28328
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 39
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
Sounds like you have a good setup! I just cant stand the "cali" look as you put it.
2007 Silverado Classic LBZ CCLB
Home of the 18 point U-Turn.
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Hammer Down!
Status: Offline
Join Date: Nov 2003
Member ID: 10025
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Age: 22
Posts: 747
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
If you don't like smoke...get out of the Diesel section! Roll the coals! ![]() 2005- 2500, Duramax/Allison, torsion bars cranked with 1" block, 33-12.50R17 Mickey T MTZ's on 17x9 MKW-27, Silverline 4" stainless straight pipe, Predator programmer, tie-rod sleeves, much more. '96 Z-71 Sold |
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Registered User
Status: Offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Member ID: 49609
Pics: My Gallery
Location: california
Posts: 106
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
for reals
2004 gmc extended cab
PPE stage IV tranny PPE HOT+2 tune + boost valve 2005 siverado reg cab hypertech, magnaflow, k&n 2001 S-10 6.0/T56
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Hot damn
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Love the stacks and the occasional smoke. Sometimes I wish I had a diesel just so I could put stacks on
![]() Is that lame or what ![]()
91' rx7
92' chevy k2500 5spd 4x4 84' ford f150 4x4 -steve |
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member ID: 26321
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada
Age: 31
Posts: 489
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Ohhhhhhh, I see. If I can make my truck blow smoke, it's cool. I see. I guess it is, just like lifting a 4X4 just to go to the mall is cool. Why don't you guys just put a garbage bag over your air filter. LOTS of black smoke then.
Then you can line your smoke belching piece of crap up against my clean burning truck and see who is the coolest... Bill Bill
'99 2500 Suburban'07 Kawasaki Mean Streak'97 Chevy XCSB 4X4 350 Vortec 1500 '94 GMC Crew Cab 4X4 Diesel 3500
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Registered User
Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member ID: 26321
Pics: My Gallery
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada
Age: 31
Posts: 489
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
Will do, RicerBoi. Bill
'99 2500 Suburban'07 Kawasaki Mean Streak'97 Chevy XCSB 4X4 350 Vortec 1500 '94 GMC Crew Cab 4X4 Diesel 3500
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Registered User
|
Re: Are Stacks/Smoke considered Riced?
Quote:
No, no you've got it all wrong. Those that do blow smoke forget they aren't at the drag strip anymore, so they like to see how quick they can get up to say 100 mph before they see the cops ahead..........oops too late. But seriously, didn't you read before, the reason for this is only because to get the horsepower needed to satisfy their wants, they turn up the quantity of fuel to the cylinders, which in turns, just happens to blow a black cloud of smoke out the stack, which, yes, does happen look to a certain degree of 'cool'. This is not so on the road around town, only at the drag strip, but those that think on the contrary are only trying to keep up with the you-know-whos ![]() |
|
|