Go Back   FSC Forum > General Discussion > Performance > Port Injection (96+ / OBD-II)
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Supporting Members Don't see these ads...learn more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2008, 08:52 PM   #1
paw2000
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Member ID: 79325
Location: millville
Age: 42
Posts: 40
this Intake manifold possibile?
I was searching around for alternates to the marine intake and stumbled across this from Edelbrok (High-Flo T.P.I. Vortec Baseplate Only #3817 ) Is it possible to take a Corvette or Firebird TPI Hardware and using the vortec baseplate make it work on the L31 motors in the 96-99 trucks. I searched and was able to locate a complete TPI from a 92 camaro and with this baseplate should be able to have a working system. Any thoughts on this?
96 yukon 4wd 2 dr
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 11:10 PM   #2
TLL
Registered User

TLL's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Member ID: 73169
Location: Orlando/Daytona FL
Age: 43
Posts: 63
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
It will work. There are few guys on this forum that are running that set up. I considered TPI but for less than the cost of that Vortec TPI intake alone ($400) you could buy a Holley Stealth Ram. I'm in the process of putting one on my Tahoe right now. Go to www.stealthram.com to see a comparison of the two setups.
2000 Tahoe Limited-Powerdyne,Comp Cams, MSD, KenneBell, OBX, FlowMasters, TransGo, Multi-Tec IIs set @ 85 psi, Allen Nelson tuned, BellTech(3/3 drop), Hotchkis, Bilstein, 3.73 posi, Ported MAF & throttle body, e-fans, Cross drilled rotors w/oversized calipers. www.cardomain.com/ride/3047813
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 07:46 AM   #3
paw2000
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Member ID: 79325
Location: millville
Age: 42
Posts: 40
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
I looked at the stealthram, I read there is issue with the distributer hitting the manifold. The complete kit Holley has comes with a small dizzy, but it states its only for motors up to 95. I checked with MSD, accell and others and finding a dizzy for the vortec has been tough. I'll check the site out, thanks for the info.
96 yukon 4wd 2 dr
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 04:26 PM   #4
TLL
Registered User

TLL's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Member ID: 73169
Location: Orlando/Daytona FL
Age: 43
Posts: 63
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Its tight but it works fine with a Vortec distributor because you don't turn a Vortec to adjust the timing like the older ones. The computer controls the timing. They make a Vortec version of the intake. Just look on Summit or Jegs. A Vortec distributor cap sits much lower than the old HEI too so it does not interfere with the plenum. What you are reading referes to not being able to use an old HEI on a pre 1996 intake. A TPI will not flow well enough for the potential of Vortec heads so you will be giving up power that way as well.
2000 Tahoe Limited-Powerdyne,Comp Cams, MSD, KenneBell, OBX, FlowMasters, TransGo, Multi-Tec IIs set @ 85 psi, Allen Nelson tuned, BellTech(3/3 drop), Hotchkis, Bilstein, 3.73 posi, Ported MAF & throttle body, e-fans, Cross drilled rotors w/oversized calipers. www.cardomain.com/ride/3047813
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 07:05 PM   #5
paw2000
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Member ID: 79325
Location: millville
Age: 42
Posts: 40
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Thanks for the info, I read so many different problems and its hard to find answers. Which throttle body did you use? I looked thru the site and most of the rides were the older TPI cars. I have a complete 95 LT1 engine if I need to borrow parts from like the trottle body. I'm pulling the vortec motor soon as I have a coolant leak and figure nows the time to upgrade.
96 yukon 4wd 2 dr
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 06:13 PM   #6
TLL
Registered User

TLL's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Member ID: 73169
Location: Orlando/Daytona FL
Age: 43
Posts: 63
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by paw2000
Thanks for the info, I read so many different problems and its hard to find answers. Which throttle body did you use? I looked thru the site and most of the rides were the older TPI cars. I have a complete 95 LT1 engine if I need to borrow parts from like the trottle body. I'm pulling the vortec motor soon as I have a coolant leak and figure nows the time to upgrade.


I am using an older Accel 1000cfm twin 58mm throttle body on mine but the stealth ram accepts any TPI ot LT1 throttle body. The LT1 is a good way to go with a conversion from a stock vortec set up because the TPS and IAC sensors will plug right in to the vortec harness and it uses the same style throttle cable too.
2000 Tahoe Limited-Powerdyne,Comp Cams, MSD, KenneBell, OBX, FlowMasters, TransGo, Multi-Tec IIs set @ 85 psi, Allen Nelson tuned, BellTech(3/3 drop), Hotchkis, Bilstein, 3.73 posi, Ported MAF & throttle body, e-fans, Cross drilled rotors w/oversized calipers. www.cardomain.com/ride/3047813
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 06:23 PM   #7
oldred95
needs to get a life

oldred95's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Mar 2004
Member ID: 13448
Location: Live in Enid, OK From Kiowa, KS I'm a Jayhawker, not a sooner
Age: 20
Posts: 9,094
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
From what I've gathered the stealth ram and LT1 and LT4 style intakes aren't all that truck friendly because of the short intake runners. They don't really promote good lowend torque like the TPI intake does with its LONG runners.
1995 Silverado - Very torquey, fun to drive (see below)
1999 NBS Silverdo - Torque? Never heard of such a thing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 10:15 PM   #8
Tbi-MAX
Burban Boys

Tbi-MAX's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Member ID: 62802
Location: Desert
Age: 25
Posts: 2,801
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldred95
From what I've gathered the stealth ram and LT1 and LT4 style intakes aren't all that truck friendly because of the short intake runners. They don't really promote good lowend torque like the TPI intake does with its LONG runners.

also something to this tune is what i was told as well. thus the reason i didnt get the HSR at 1st. i think with the brackets and everything, rails etc. it came out to be like 7-800$ swap. and still wouldnt develop the lowend like a truck needed. unless its really light and gutted scsb.
383ci-6.3L L05/ 454 BBC TBI / 90# @ 25 / VAFPR / MSD6AL / WIX 14x4 / Vortec Heads .520 lift/ 214/224 - .442/.465 - 112lsa / 4.030 -12cc dish / 3.75 stroke - 1piece / Walbro 255 / Moroso 6QT / Headman LT headers / 3" custom single exhaust / 4" RC liftkit / MTZ 33/12.5/17/ vette edition 4L60E - 4.56
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 12:04 AM   #9
96SLT350
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Member ID: 54698
Location: Ontario
Posts: 297
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
So Stealth Ram is definately the way to go then for the vortec engine intake manifold?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 11:02 AM   #10
TLL
Registered User

TLL's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Member ID: 73169
Location: Orlando/Daytona FL
Age: 43
Posts: 63
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
My stealth ram is going on my supercharged Tahoe Limited which has a 4.11 rear gear so low end is not really much concern to me. As far as what you need to buy the intake is $360 and if you go with the matching fuel rail/regulator kit it is another $180. I'm using a fabricated rail with an external adjustable regulator. The injectors vary in price by what you need. I went with a used set of LS1 injectors which are rated at 28.8lbs. They cost me $50 from a guy on thirdrdgen.com. I had the throttle body from a TPI unit I bought on ebay for $75 and sold for $150 without the throttle body. There are no brackets to buy. I have about $600 total in mine with the new injector wire pigtails and I feel the performance is well worth the cost.
2000 Tahoe Limited-Powerdyne,Comp Cams, MSD, KenneBell, OBX, FlowMasters, TransGo, Multi-Tec IIs set @ 85 psi, Allen Nelson tuned, BellTech(3/3 drop), Hotchkis, Bilstein, 3.73 posi, Ported MAF & throttle body, e-fans, Cross drilled rotors w/oversized calipers. www.cardomain.com/ride/3047813

Last edited by TLL : 04-15-2008 at 11:03 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 06:13 PM   #11
paw2000
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Member ID: 79325
Location: millville
Age: 42
Posts: 40
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLL
I am using an older Accel 1000cfm twin 58mm throttle body on mine but the stealth ram accepts any TPI ot LT1 throttle body. The LT1 is a good way to go with a conversion from a stock vortec set up because the TPS and IAC sensors will plug right in to the vortec harness and it uses the same style throttle cable too.

Thats good news as I have a complete LT1 engine to test fit components on the truck. As for the LT1 not "truck" friendly is not being fair. My 95 impala SS is not a lite weight vehicle at 4061 lbs.. my yukon@4600 lbs. so they are close in weight. And most of us are not racing the trucks, we want fun vehicles that can run with the pack, and still tow the boat, haul the junk.

Anyone have pictures of thier install? how they routed the AC hoses, connected thier harness to the injectors. Thanks
96 yukon 4wd 2 dr
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2008, 07:00 AM   #12
Fast305
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Member ID: 30914
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 2,793
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by paw2000
Thats good news as I have a complete LT1 engine to test fit components on the truck. As for the LT1 not "truck" friendly is not being fair. My 95 impala SS is not a lite weight vehicle at 4061 lbs.. my yukon@4600 lbs. so they are close in weight. And most of us are not racing the trucks, we want fun vehicles that can run with the pack, and still tow the boat, haul the junk.

Anyone have pictures of thier install? how they routed the AC hoses, connected thier harness to the injectors. Thanks

The Impala LT1 has the same head design as the Vortec and the same camshaft. That makes it very much like a vortec. The LT1 is NOT nearly as "truck friendly" as a TPI is. The TPI will kill the LT1 from off-idle to about 3,600 rpm. I don't know many that are running a daily driver truck much over 3,000 rpm for any appreciable time.
1983 G20 Conversion Van, 310 TPI, 9.5:1 compression, Custom Reed Roller cam, TBI 305 187 Swirl Ports, Doug Thorley Tri-Y headers, dual 3" exhaust, 4L60(1992 700r4), 3.08 gears. 7730 ECM
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 04:23 PM   #13
JD'98
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Member ID: 11092
Location: CA
Age: 20
Posts: 98
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast305
The Impala LT1 has the same head design as the Vortec and the same camshaft. That makes it very much like a vortec. The LT1 is NOT nearly as "truck friendly" as a TPI is. The TPI will kill the LT1 from off-idle to about 3,600 rpm. I don't know many that are running a daily driver truck much over 3,000 rpm for any appreciable time.

why do you think the marine intake would kill the LT1 intake?
1998 Chevy C1500 ext. cab

Last edited by JD'98 : 04-28-2008 at 08:05 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 05:56 PM   #14
TLL
Registered User

TLL's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Member ID: 73169
Location: Orlando/Daytona FL
Age: 43
Posts: 63
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast305
The Impala LT1 has the same head design as the Vortec and the same camshaft. That makes it very much like a vortec. The LT1 is NOT nearly as "truck friendly" as a TPI is. The TPI will kill the LT1 from off-idle to about 3,600 rpm. I don't know many that are running a daily driver truck much over 3,000 rpm for any appreciable time.


Fast305, I know that you have a good running vehicle and know your stuff but that seems like an odd statement to make. So what do you tell people you only want to race them from an idle to 3000 rpm? In my opinion the generally accepted standard is 1/4 mile performance. I think my Stealth Ram will overcome your TPIs better low end torque by the end of a 1/4 mile, and I don't come off the line at an idle either, I leave at about 2500 rpm so my engine is seeing 3000 rpm by the time my rear bumper passes the tree.

TLL
2000 Tahoe Limited-Powerdyne,Comp Cams, MSD, KenneBell, OBX, FlowMasters, TransGo, Multi-Tec IIs set @ 85 psi, Allen Nelson tuned, BellTech(3/3 drop), Hotchkis, Bilstein, 3.73 posi, Ported MAF & throttle body, e-fans, Cross drilled rotors w/oversized calipers. www.cardomain.com/ride/3047813
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 10:26 PM   #15
19doug90
Registered User

19doug90's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Member ID: 41094
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 514
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLL
Fast305, I know that you have a good running vehicle and know your stuff but that seems like an odd statement to make. So what do you tell people you only want to race them from an idle to 3000 rpm? In my opinion the generally accepted standard is 1/4 mile performance. I think my Stealth Ram will overcome your TPIs better low end torque by the end of a 1/4 mile, and I don't come off the line at an idle either, I leave at about 2500 rpm so my engine is seeing 3000 rpm by the time my rear bumper passes the tree.

TLL

are we talking drag trucks here or a dd/trail truck.

Sure i opted on my third gen camaro to swap from a tpi to a stealth ram because my cam was going to make peak power at 6000 rpms.

But who the hell drag races a 5000+ pound truck? talk about a waste of time/effort/money.

I'm with fast personally im going with a tpi on my vortec truck because i dont think ive ever taken it past 3500 driving around town. i cant imagine trying to drag race my truck.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 10:28 PM   #16
19doug90
Registered User

19doug90's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Member ID: 41094
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 514
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD'98
why do you think the marine intake would kill the LT1 intake?

same reason a tpi would, runner length. The intake is designed for high velocity hence high torque.

Anything like a stealth ram or lt1 intake has short runners, is way less restrictive and is great for top end power, but less restriction comes with less velocity, which means you lose low end torque.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 03:27 PM   #17
MSlewis
Supporting Member


Status: Offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Member ID: 80192
Location: Jax , Florida
Age: 39
Posts: 166
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
After personally anylizing the runners on both the LT1 and RamJet intakes, and seeing GMPP's dyno graph for the RamJet350 put down an almost linear 400 ftlbs of torque with stock vortech heads and a tiny cam, I can't see how the short runner length is considered to be a torque detriment. I think it has more to do with the head port design and flow cahracteristics as to wether low rpm torque can be acheived. IIRC the stock 92'Z28's numbers were no match for the stock 93's with the only major differences being the intake design(ignition & cooling notwithstanding).The newer,shorter,runner lengths and port designs are an excellent blend of both high velocity @ low rpm and high rpm breathability.

This is of course my opionion and we all know what those are worth. Nonetheless I too am contemplating wich intake to run on my 383 wich currently is TBI. Both the RamJet and StealthRam look impressive,however the Ramjet's open plenum section above the 4-5" long port entry is alot narrower,could have something to do with it's torque #'s. The StealthRam has longer runners, but with larger plenum area, could end up being about the same. Price is about the same, give or take a few bucks. Hmmmm....

Even thought about running the StealthRam with the stock twin TB blocked off and machining/modifying the upper plenum to accept my 96's single TB in the center so as not to have to modify cables/brackets/intake snorkels. Would only need to do fuel lines and swap dizzy's.Hmmmm......
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 03:41 PM   #18
Pauly
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Member ID: 19647
Location: Woodstock Ontario Canada
Age: 32
Posts: 5,320
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19doug90
are we talking drag trucks here or a dd/trail truck.

Sure i opted on my third gen camaro to swap from a tpi to a stealth ram because my cam was going to make peak power at 6000 rpms.

But who the hell drag races a 5000+ pound truck? talk about a waste of time/effort/money.

I'm with fast personally im going with a tpi on my vortec truck because i dont think ive ever taken it past 3500 driving around town. i cant imagine trying to drag race my truck.
Why in earth woudl you even change from teh stock intake if you never see above 3500 rpm when driving around town?

There are tons of people who race 5000+ trucks at the drags. Trucks are standard fair at the drags nowadays. It doesnt matter how heavy teh vehicle is, it can be made to accelerate very fast.

Any truck that accelerates well at the strip can accelerate that heavy trailer up a hill(provided the truck has a reasonable TC and other parts for towing)

peace
Pauly
97 GMC 2wd RCSB 5.7, s10 2700 footstall, Hooker 24621hkr LT's , 2.5" cats dual 4"pipes exit B4 pass. side tire, custom driveshaft 3.42 G80 FIPK MAF descreen GM/Mercruiser Marine intake manifold 29lb LS2(EV6) injectors Ed Wright PCM(best mod), LT4 KM 14.8@94mph 2.007 4000lbs 122mph
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 03:47 PM   #19
Pauly
Registered User

Status: Offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Member ID: 19647
Location: Woodstock Ontario Canada
Age: 32
Posts: 5,320
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSlewis
Even thought about running the StealthRam with the stock twin TB blocked off and machining/modifying the upper plenum to accept my 96's single TB in the center so as not to have to modify cables/brackets/intake snorkels. Would only need to do fuel lines and swap dizzy's.Hmmmm......

Sounds like a bunch of work, esp when a marine intake pretty much bolts a 96-2000 Vortec 305/350 truck.


The 2nd intake down just needs a t-body on it to work on your engine. Plus you can buy teh edelbrock fuel rail kit.

http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_...ds_chevy.shtml

Unless you are planning on over 430hp(naturally aspirated), teh stock intake, will work. Obviuosly an intake without all teh injection debris RIGHT INSIDE THE PLENUM will make more power than teh stock L31 intake.


BTW I think the LT1 would make an excellent engine in a truck, as would a TPI as does a TBI 350 and Vortec 350. The LT1's make strong low rpm torque, much stronger than the GEN 3 engines.
peace
Pauly
97 GMC 2wd RCSB 5.7, s10 2700 footstall, Hooker 24621hkr LT's , 2.5" cats dual 4"pipes exit B4 pass. side tire, custom driveshaft 3.42 G80 FIPK MAF descreen GM/Mercruiser Marine intake manifold 29lb LS2(EV6) injectors Ed Wright PCM(best mod), LT4 KM 14.8@94mph 2.007 4000lbs 122mph

Last edited by Pauly : 05-14-2008 at 03:49 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 05:36 PM   #20
19doug90
Registered User

19doug90's Avatar

Status: Offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Member ID: 41094
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 514
Re: this Intake manifold possibile?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pauly
Why in earth woudl you even change from teh stock intake if you never see above 3500 rpm when driving around town?

There are tons of people who race 5000+ trucks at the drags. Trucks are standard fair at the drags nowadays. It doesnt matter how heavy teh vehicle is, it can be made to accelerate very fast.

Any truck that accelerates well at the strip can accelerate that heavy trailer up a hill(provided the truck has a reasonable TC and other parts for towing)

peace
Pauly

simple cause i want more torque from a stop, hence a tpi intake.

Ya anything is possible, and i guess if putting a 500hp engine into the 12's is your thing then by all means have at er, just for most of us thats not why we own trucks.

and going to have to disagree again, youre running a hp intake youre going to be optimizing that with a big cam that makes useable power between 3000-6000 rpms. Sure if youre driving along youd have tons of power to get up a hill, but not so much if you have to come to a dead stop half way up it with said heavy trailer.

Last edited by 19doug90 : 05-14-2008 at 05:36 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Advertisements
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump